Pro-choice?
If I am not for something, am I necessarily against it? If I am not for guns, am I against guns? Or perhaps the death penalty might be a better point. If I say, “I am not for the death penalty,” is my stance against the death penalty? I believe the answer is yes. However there are clever ways in language that we can use to try to trick ourselves into not being for something and not being against it at the same time. An example would be the words “pro-choice” and “pro-life”. I think it would be correct in saying that if I am “pro-life” then I am not for and stand against abortion. Yet some would say that just because they are “pro-choice” does not mean they are for abortion. I believe this is a flawed logic, perhaps trying to be dialectical even. Still, trying to have choice to choose abortion yet saying that you are not necessarily for abortion is treading very dangerously on moral subjectivism. I do not believe that it can logically be explained correctly to have this stance. Therefore the term “pro-choice” is not correct and is using a form of obfuscation to remove the negative sound of “anti-life”.
-Jason
There is always a point in time, I believe, where each one of us has a choice to make about truth. An infamous man once asked the Author of Truth, “What is truth?” To many times I feel we sacrifice the truth for what is convenient for us. We live relativistically in a world of absolutes. In doing so we try to justify each of our actions and motives against some preconceived idea that we are right and that others are wrong. In fact, what we have done is believed a lie which often times is far more complex than the simple truth. To say that there are no absolutes is a contradiction in itself, because in saying that, an absolute has been stated. An internal contradiction has been created and holds no ground. Living with relative truth means that there are no “wrongs” and there are no “rights”, only what makes sense at the time. All pursuits for “fairness” would cease. Racism, sexism, discrimination, would be meaningless. To put it bluntly, no one would have the right to claim that they are right because there would be no moral basis for what is right.
We have a new puppy in our family. His is a 
